Hobbs Steel Erectors v. Bashline

Supreme Court of Florida
Hobbs Steel Erectors v. Bashline, 179 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1965)
Bridge, Connell, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal, Trow

Hobbs Steel Erectors v. Bashline

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have heard oral argument on the petition and cross-petition for certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission which affirmed in part an order of a deputy commissioner granting certain compensation benefits and remanded part of the order for further findings of fact thereto.

A careful study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that the petition and cross-petition should be denied.

The petition for fees for the attorneys’ services relative to the cross-petition is denied also.

The attorneys for respondent Ronald Bashline are awarded a fee in the amount of Three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00) for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TROW-BRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
HOBBS STEEL ERECTORS and Security Mutual Insurance Company of New York v. Ronald BASHLINE and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published