Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.
Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.
179 So. 2d 210
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date Tune 24, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.