Dean v. Hatala

Supreme Court of Florida November 10, 1965

Dean v. Hatala, 179 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1965)

1965 Fla. LEXIS 2927

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission b.earing date June 2, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

*856Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ-, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Joseph DEAN v. HATALA & LESS, U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., and F. I. C.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published