Dean v. Hatala
Dean v. Hatala
179 So. 2d 855; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2927
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dean v. Hatala
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission b.earing date June 2, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.