LePrince v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Florida
LePrince v. McLeod, 179 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1965)
Caldwell, Con, Ervin, Hob, McCord, Nell, Ret, Son, Thomas, Thornal

LePrince v. McLeod

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Virginia E. LePRINCE and Achille E. LePrince v. Norman McLEOD, M.D.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published