Rosenkrantz v. Druckman
Supreme Court of Florida
Rosenkrantz v. Druckman, 180 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1965)
Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal
Rosenkrantz v. Druckman
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date August 9, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petitions for attorneys’ fees are denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joseph ROSENKRANTZ v. Ira J. DRUCKMAN, Mitchell Thomas, E. L. Thompson Company, Pacific Employers Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission
- Status
- Published