City of Hialeah v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Florida
City of Hialeah v. Hunt, 182 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1965)
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas

City of Hialeah v. Hunt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petitions for writs of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL, and ERVIN, JJ. concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
CITY OF HIALEAH and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Fred T. HUNT, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents CITY OF HIALEAH and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Fred T. HUNT, Jr. and the Florida Industrial Commission
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published