Supreme Court of Florida, 1966

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided January 19, 1966 · Caldwell, Con, Drew, Hobson, Nell, Ret, Thornal
182 So. 2d 243 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Shambo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for respondent Edward G. Shambo is awarded a fee in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.