Blue Ribbon Laundry v. Black

Supreme Court of Florida
Blue Ribbon Laundry v. Black, 183 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1966)
Agree, Caldwell, Con, Connell, Ervin, Nell, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal, Warren

Blue Ribbon Laundry v. Black

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing the date April 26, 1965.

After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees filed by Respondent and Cross-Petitioner J. R. Black is granted in the amount of three hundred and fifty dollars.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., concur. O’CONNELL, J., dissents with opinion. CALDWELL, J., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, dissent and agree with O’CON-NELL, J.

Dissenting Opinion

O’CONNELL, Justice

(dissenting).

I would grant the writ and quash the order of the Full Commission and the deputy.

CALDWELL, J., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, agree.

Reference

Full Case Name
BLUE RIBBON LAUNDRY and Corporate Group Service, Inc. v. J. R. BLACK and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents J. R. BLACK v. BLUE RIBBON LAUNDRY, Corporate Group Service, Inc., and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published