Supreme Court of Florida, 1966

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 9, 1966 · Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
183 So. 2d 688; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3734 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed' with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.