Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance

Supreme Court of Florida March 16, 1966

Puntervold v. Allstate Insurance, 184 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3777

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 16, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.Á.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *177there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Edward Milton PUNTERVOLD v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, American Motorists Insurance Company, and F. I. C.
Status: Published