Supreme Court of Florida, 1966

Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria

Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 23, 1966 · Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
184 So. 2d 423; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3790 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lainesse v. St. Clairs Cafeteria

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *424there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney’s fees are both denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.