Supreme Court of Florida, 1966

Lou's Tailoring & Uniform Co. v. Rolle

Lou's Tailoring & Uniform Co. v. Rolle
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 23, 1966 · Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Thornal, Warren
184 So. 2d 882; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3811 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lou's Tailoring & Uniform Co. v. Rolle

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the record, briefs and arguments leads us to the conclusion that the order of the deputy commissioner , is 'supported by competent substantial evidence and comports with the essential requirements of law. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1951). Its affirmance by the full Industrial Commission is therefore without error. Certiorari is denied.

The attorneys for respondent Nathaniel Rolle are awarded a fee in the amount of three hundred fifrty dollars ($350) for services in this court.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.