Gold v. Dinkler Management Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Gold v. Dinkler Management Corp., 185 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1966)
1966 Fla. LEXIS 3645
Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Gold v. Dinkler Management Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Herman GOLD v. DINKLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published