Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida March 2, 1966

Mittelsdorf v. Riconed, Inc., 186 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3655

Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 20, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Lucille MITTELSDORF v. RICONED, INC., d/b/a Burger King of Miami and National Surety Corporation, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published