Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Florida May 4, 1966

Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co., 186 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3665

Caldwell, Connell, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida *496Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-" tial requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Shelley BRINSON v. MIMS & THOMAS MANUFACTURING CO., Employer, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Carrier, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published