Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.
Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.
186 So. 2d 495; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3665
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-" tial requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.