Bartilotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Florida May 4, 1966

Bartilotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 186 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3676

Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Anthony BARTILOTTA v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published