Supreme Court of Florida, 1966

Bartilotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Bartilotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 4, 1966 · Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
186 So. 2d 513; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3676 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bartilotta v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.