Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun

Supreme Court of Florida
Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun, 186 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1966)
1966 Fla. LEXIS 3685
Connell, Drew, Ervin, Hobson, Ret, Thornal

Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we are asked to review an order *784of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of October 27, 1965.

After having heard oral argument and having considered the record and the briefs of the parties we have determined that in entering the order complained of the commission did not deviate from the essential requirements of law. The petition and the cross-petition are both denied.

The respondent, Dale W. Calhoun, is granted an attorney’s fee of $350.00.

It is so ordered.

DREW, O’CONNELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents in part.

Dissenting Opinion

THORNAL, Chief Justice

(dissenting in part).

I would deny the petition but grant the cross-petition.

Reference

Full Case Name
CECO STEEL PRODUCTS v. Dale W. CALHOUN and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published