Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun
Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun
186 So. 2d 783; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3685
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ceco Steel Products v. Calhoun
Opinion of the Court
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we are asked to review an order
After having heard oral argument and having considered the record and the briefs of the parties we have determined that in entering the order complained of the commission did not deviate from the essential requirements of law. The petition and the cross-petition are both denied.
The respondent, Dale W. Calhoun, is granted an attorney’s fee of $350.00.
It is so ordered.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting in part).
I would deny the petition but grant the cross-petition.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.