Crosby v. Tampa Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Florida June 8, 1966

Crosby v. Tampa Electric Co., 187 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3702

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 7 February 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: William A. CROSBY v. TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Globe Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published