Boring v. Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co.
Boring v. Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co.
187 So. 2d 893; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3345
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Boring v. Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co.
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully considered the record and briefs and have heard oral argument by the parties. We find that in entering the order under attack the respondent commission did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. Accordingly, the petition and the cross-petition are both denied. The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.