Stover v. Bushnell Steel Products Division

Supreme Court of Florida June 29, 1966

Stover v. Bushnell Steel Products Division, 187 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3348

Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

*895Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and-ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Raymond STOVER v. BUSHNELL STEEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published