Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc., 188 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1966)
1966 Fla. LEXIS 3357
Caldwell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Bivins v. Tallahassee Motors, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Claimant’s motion for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
James BIVINS v. TALLAHASSEE MOTORS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and F. I. C.
Status
Published