Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida June 15, 1966

Dickman v. Beverly Manufacturing Corp., 189 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3195

Barns, Connell, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral arguments. We find that in the entry of the Order under attack the respondent Commission did not deviate from • the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of cer-tiorari and the petition for fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Raymond F. DICKMAN v. BEVERLY MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, and Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency
Status: Published