Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal

Supreme Court of Florida June 8, 1966

Scott-Mattson Farms, Inc. v. Carbajal, 189 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3196

Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 17, 1965. ■

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *612there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Attorney for Respondent Antonio Carba-jal is granted a fee in the sum of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: SCOTT-MATTSON FARMS, INC., and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Antonio CARBAJAL and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published