Matthews v. Matthews
Matthews v. Matthews
189 So. 2d 629; 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3205
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Mackle v. Mackle (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have heard oral argument on the petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 177 So.2d 497, because of apparent jurisdiction in this court.
After oral argument and a careful study of the record and briefs, we conclude this: court is without jurisdiction in the matter because of lack of a direct conflict as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.
The writ is discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.