Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission, 190 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 1966)
Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts

Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commisssion bearing date May 19, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. ■

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Herbert Marion MONROSE v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION
Status
Published