Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Bell v. State, 191 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1966)
1966 Fla. LEXIS 3335
Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Bell v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict does not appear. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
D. B. BELL, Jr. v. The STATE of Florida
Status
Published