Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida October 26, 1966

Trollinger v. Florida Industrial Commission, 191 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 1966)

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Petition for Attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, ' JJ-, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: William J. TROLLINGER v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Tropigas, Inc. of Florida and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Status: Published