Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of Florida
Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell, 192 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1966)
Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Spray Cool Enterprises, Inc. v. Cantrell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 23, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Respondent Ellis Cantrell is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
SPRAY COOL ENTERPRISES, INC., and Phoenix Assurance Company v. Ellis CANTRELL and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published