Lucerne Hotel v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Florida
Lucerne Hotel v. Cherry, 192 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1966)
Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Lucerne Hotel v. Cherry

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is denied; the petition for attorney’s fee in connection with cross-petition is denied. The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Respondent Ann L. Cherry in connection with defense against petition for writ of certiorari is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
LUCERNE HOTEL, Employer, and Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Workmen's Compensation Insurance Carrier v. Ann L. CHERRY, Employee and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency
Status
Published