Bevis v. Eastland

Supreme Court of Florida
Bevis v. Eastland, 194 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1966)
Bring, Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Bevis v. Eastland

Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

We here review by certiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, affirming a ruling by the State Board of Accountancy denying reciprocal certificates to certain persons for various reasons. See Bevis v. Eastland (DCA 1) 186 So.2d 818.

The petition for certiorari was buttressed by a certificate of the District Court that the case passes upon a question of great public interest, and we therefore have jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4(2), Constitution of Florida, F.S.A.

The factual background, questions pre--sented and final decision appear in the: opinion of the District Court. We have: considered their decision in the light of the: decision of this court, this day filed, in Mercer v. Hemmings, 194 So.2d 579 and finding no error in the decision of the District Court, their opinion is adopted as the view of this court and the writ of certiorari heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, CALDWELL, ERVIN and SE-BRING (Retired), JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Herman W. BEVIS, Individually and as partners doing business under the firm name of Price Waterhouse & Co. v. Mark W. EASTLAND
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published