Board of Public Instruction v. Nicholson

Supreme Court of Florida July 27, 1966

Board of Public Instruction v. Nicholson, 195 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1966)

1966 Fla. LEXIS 3020

Caldwell, Con, Drew, Ervin, Graessle, Nell, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 22 March 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

Claimant’s attorney is awarded a fee of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

After oral argument on petition for rehearing granted and further consideration of record and briefs the first paragraph of said opinion is hereby revised to read as follows:

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review orders of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing dates February 23, 1966, and March 22, 1966.

As revised the opinion filed July 27, 1966, is hereby adhered to on rehearing.

THORNAL, C. J., DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and GRAESSLE, Circuit Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., and v. Carl D. NICHOLSON and Florida Industrial Commission, and
Status: Published