Latusek v. Mosam Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida
Latusek v. Mosam Corp., 196 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1966)
Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Latusek v. Mosam Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A,

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Alyce Ann LATUSEK v. MOSAM CORPORATION, the Home Indemnity Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published