Shelby Mutual Insurance Company v. Schuitema
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Oppenheim v. Reliance Insurance (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1991)
- Lackey v. Virginia Surety Company (Va. 1969)
- Barnette v. Hartford Insurance Group (Wyo. 1982)
- Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1982)
- Zenti v. Home Insurance Co. (Iowa 1978)
- Transit Casualty Co. v. Hartman's Inc. (Va. 1978)
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Bierman (Md. 1972)
- Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd. (Mass. 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Authorized to Do Business in the State of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Henry SCHUITEMA, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens and Edward A. Perse, Miami, for petitioner.
Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari, having shown jurisdictional conflict, seeks review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 183 So.2d 571.
The rule of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Co., 168 So.2d 688, collides directly with the decision here reviewed and poses our problem of resolving the conflict.
It is our conclusion that Judge Smith, in his penetrating analysis of the policy and persuasive authorities, has reached the preferable conclusion.
The writ is discharged.
THORNAL, C.J., THOMAS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and PARKER, Circuit Judge, concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.