Stanton v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
Stanton v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co., 194 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1967)
Caldwell, Con, Drew, Ervin, Nell, Thornal

Stanton v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve-no useful purpose and it is therefore dis— *593pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Willie STANTON v. STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CO.
Status
Published