Chinnici v. Curtis & Kaplan, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
Chinnici v. Curtis & Kaplan, Inc., 194 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1967)
Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
Chinnici v. Curtis & Kaplan, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frank CHINNICI v. CURTIS & KAPLAN, INC., Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
- Status
- Published