Supreme Court of Florida, 1967

Federal Bake Shop v. Unrue

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 8, 1967 · Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

196 So. 2d 123; 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3954 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

B. C.'Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, ""Orlando, for petitioners., Charles J. Luke, II, Daytona Beach, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and. J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we "have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date No-’ ■vember 17, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that "there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an at•torney’s fee is hereby' granted in the ■amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. •

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.