Perron v. Withrow

Supreme Court of Florida March 22, 1967

Perron v. Withrow, 196 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1967)

1967 Fla. LEXIS 3977

Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Gertrude S. PERRON, as Administratrix of the Estate of Albert E. Perron v. Earl D. WITHROW, d/b/a Earl's Market and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Status: Published