Supreme Court of Florida, 1967

Vazquez v. Dilido Hotel

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 22, 1967 · Caldwell, Con, Drew, Ervin, Nell, Roberts

196 So. 2d 744; 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3978 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting):

I would set for oral argument.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 15, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and O’CON- . NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with Opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.