Davis v. Frostee

Supreme Court of Florida
Davis v. Frostee, 197 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1967)
1967 Fla. LEXIS 4047
Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Thomas, Thornal

Davis v. Frostee

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

*3Our consideration, of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles D. DAVIS v. CAP'N FROSTEE and Shelby Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published