Overman v. Schun Co.
Overman v. Schun Co.
197 So. 2d 496; 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4063
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Overman v. Schun Co.
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.