Armour Creameries v. Parish

Supreme Court of Florida
Armour Creameries v. Parish, 203 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1967)
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Thomas, Thornal

Armour Creameries v. Parish

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

Wé find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for the respondent Jessie V. Parish is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
ARMOUR CREAMERIES, Self-Insured v. Jessie v. PARISH and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published