Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Supreme Court of Florida
Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home, 203 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1967)
1967 Fla. LEXIS 3432
Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Grimsley v. Florence Crittenden Home

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there *167has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys’ fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ„ concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Julia S. GRIMSLEY v. The FLORENCE CRITTENDEN HOME
Status
Published