Waugh v. Lattimore

Supreme Court of Florida
Waugh v. Lattimore, 204 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 1967)
Adams, Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Thornal

Waugh v. Lattimore

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 1, 1967.

We..find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harold H. WAUGH and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. James LATTIMORE and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published