Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham
Supreme Court of Florida
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham, 206 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1968)
Adams, Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation v. Dessie E. GRESHAM
- Status
- Published