Cromer v. Clark Electric Co.
Cromer v. Clark Electric Co.
206 So. 2d 646
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cromer v. Clark Electric Co.
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of September 19, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
Petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.