Williams v. Carlson Bros. Dredging

Supreme Court of Florida
Williams v. Carlson Bros. Dredging, 207 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1968)
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thornal

Williams v. Carlson Bros. Dredging

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 24, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition,, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lorenzo WILLIAMS v. CARLSON BROTHERS DREDGING New Amsterdam Casualty Company and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published